Search for: "People v Calderon" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Mandelman
Calderon, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking Finance & Insurance, sponsored the bill. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   Global – Copyright Obama and Calderon back quick conclusion to ACTA talks (Michael Geist)   Argentina Argentina: Stop plagiarism, with plagiarism? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am by Katitza Rodriguez and Nadia Kayyali
The Snowden disclosures have made it clear the Obama administration misled the Supreme Court about key issues in ACLU’s case against NSA spying, Clapper v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and CEOs: If your… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
Here is Judge Alex Kozinski, a brilliant jurist and part of this movement, in Calderon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm by Craig Robins
  There she acted as a theatre manager in the Calderon Theatre and acted in performances as well. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Since, under his reading, "Congress intended to make certain people ineligible to file bankruptcy," he found it implausible that Congress "specifically identified people to exclude from the bankruptcy process, yet permitted those same people to benefit from bankruptcy's most powerful protection: the automatic stay. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Since, under his reading, "Congress intended to make certain people ineligible to file bankruptcy," he found it implausible that Congress "specifically identified people to exclude from the bankruptcy process, yet permitted those same people to benefit from bankruptcy's most powerful protection: the automatic stay. [read post]