Search for: "People v Crossley"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Dominic Crossley is a partner at Collyer Bristow LLP. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
We have had a number of post on these issues this week – from Dominic Crossley, Adam Wagner and Mark Thomson. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
As Dominic Crossley put it in his recent post that If Eady had condoned the blackmail and allowed publication he really would have been “amoral” as the Daily Mail like to allege. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:58 am
In the case of Media CAT Ltd v Adams & Ors [2011] EWPCC 10, Media CAT accused several people of infringing pornographic material. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:23 am
We have seen what we can do to Andrew Crossley and his firm. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
In Abdullah Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd Rothman J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff US$7,500 damages in respect of an allegation that he was a people smuggler. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
Family Law Newswatch has selected its 'Top ten family law cases of 2008', comprising what it considers to be the "ten most significant family law cases reported this year".Pre-nuptial agreements figure prominently, with Crossley v Crossley, NG v KR and the recent MacLeod v MacLeod all featuring. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
However, as UK law stands there is no current legal duty on editors to inform people such as Mr Mosley prior to publication. [read post]
