Search for: "People v Das"
Results 21 - 40
of 684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 12:05 pm
The court ruled in Rucho v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
That's how the opinion reads, as well as a press release from the DA's office at the time. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:26 am
The DA's comment on defendant's refusal of consent required reversal. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
It repeatedly reminds the reader that public officials (including the DA) have the right to free speech. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
So, as a direct result of the state's failure, criminal charges against various defendants are dismissed.This is one of those rare cases in which the highest tribunal of a state rightly grants review to make clear that the lower courts are right and that an executive-level official (here, the Riverside DA) should stop making contrary claims. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
With former DA Michael Nifong's ethical lapses and eventual disbarment receiving national headlines over the past year or so, we found the case of People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 4:48 am
This seems to be originated from university slang ala væda (අල වැඩ) which means 'Potato business' is used for breaking the laws/codes of the university. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
Who'da thunk? [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm
(I say all this, by the way, having no connection whatsoever to the situation out there other than knowing a few students who are Riverside ADAs, previously working with someone (Hal Hopp) who's now a Riverside judge, and the fact that the Riverside DA is a USD Law graduate from way back. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:11 am
Page 1 2008 NY Slip Op 50318(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am
” Case No. 01001976380 | The People of the State of California v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:12 pm
Whether we unconstitutionally target people for the death penalty is a nontrivial issue. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:58 pm
And the District Attorney -- to the DA's credit -- says, yeah, it's only a t-shirt, we're cool with everything, the guy's entitled under Prop. 47 to reduce the conviction to a misdemeanor, so go ahead and do that, we stipulate. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:40 pm
I have no problem with the DA there. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:44 am
Assault v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Now, one year later, Pomerantz has released a book containing his account of his year in the DA’s office. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:52 am
The general rule is that disgruntled people cannot sue the DA, lest the DA be sued each time he prosecutes someone. [read post]
