Search for: "People v David S."
Results 21 - 40
of 5,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 11:42 am
On the theory, I imagine, that if it's good enough for television, it's good enough for San Diego. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
Professor Baldus’s work was at the center of a 1987 Supreme Court decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:14 pm
By David Worley In Zagaja v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:45 am
David A. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:17 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 8:16 am
Aditi Bagchi, Contract v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:49 pm
See David Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Plaintiffs suing for defamation seek to protect their reputation – what other people think of them, as Lord Denning (pic) defined it in Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:58 pm
The landlord was also his wife's ex-husband. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm
Finally, it was settled in People v Lawrence that recantation evidence is unreliable. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
David Hooper’s book will be a useful weapon they can happily rely on. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Supreme Court’s surprise announcement on November 7 that it would hear King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:57 pm
But that's not what was going down here.Before the murder, anyway. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
"He was always so concerned about people being treated fairly and with dignity," Hines said. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
From Emmens v Pottle (1885) onwards, the English courts allowed a means by which people not really as responsible for a defamation as the writer and commercial publisher, could avoid liability. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
David G. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
It is now the rule of democratic engagement, not the exception, ” said EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene. [read post]
