Search for: "People v Desir" Results 21 - 40 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
The number of people finding this blog by using the search string "Stack v Dowden" since I posted about the case a couple of days ago suggests to me a huge desire amongst family lawyers for some guidance upon resolving cohabitees' property disputes.When so many people choose to cohabit rather than marry, is it satisfactory that we should have to rely upon a succession of (sometimes contradictory) court decisions to enable us to advise our clients? [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:49 pm
  If it does, what about simply marrying a witness, with the internal desire that she's then not compelled to testify against you? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
  Besides, of course, a desire to kiss up to the California Supreme Court? [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
  Even if there are no threats and the third party truly is only advancing the internal desires of the would-be witness. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
  And could actualize your desires if you'd like. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  And since it doesn't get you much these days to have a scrip, we shouldn't expect people to have it in any event. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under this statute, a person commits forcible touching when they intentionally touch another person’s intimate parts, such as their genitals, buttocks, or female breasts, for the purpose of gratifying their own sexual desire or to degrade or abuse the victim. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:12 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Sometimes those two are one in the same, but for this case we'll look at a post where the desired clients are everyday people. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
The court adds: assuming that the People’s assertion is true; that the ad went from expressing intent to advertise prostitution to express a desire to “date,” the People are essentially complaining that Backpage staff scrubbed the original ad, removing any hint of illegality. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:18 am by Erica Goldberg
I recently wrote a piece for Michigan Law Review’s online journal about why United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 For example, when notice of opportunity to testify before the grand jury is provided to defense counsel, failure to timely make defendant aware of such notice or otherwise protect defendant’s right to testify (by failing to provide the People with written notice of the defendant’s desire to testify, for example) is ineffective (see, People v Jiminez, supra; People v Prest, 105 AD2d 1078 [4th Dept 1984]; see also, People… [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:46 pm
These screenshots were consistent with vorarephilia, or vore pornography, which is characterized by a neurotic desire to consume or be consumed by another person or creature. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
 There's another serious tension between our desire to expend as few resources as necessary on the criminal justice system and our hope that the results of this system comport with morality.In Miranda's case, these tensions are amply demonstrated.With serious consequences to Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 pm
Defendant traveled to Oregon “in search of a clinic to perform her desired CT-scan”—a vaginal arteriogram. [read post]