Search for: "People v Gaines"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In addition, I had gained further perspective on just how antisemitic the anti-Israel cause is via a widely reported judicial educational mission to Israel, which included 13 other federal judges. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
The bill has not gained much traction, however. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:00 am
In 2007, he co-founded ZZ Biotech, which has been working to gain federal approval of 3K3A-APC. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
In its more ancient (now tech enhanced) and generalized form it pointed to efforts at shaping the imaginaries or lifeworlds of target populations so that, having gained control of the way a target population sees and understands the world around them--makes sense of the world through a process of interpretation grounded in foundational premises about things, processes and "truths. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
The behavioral economics field gives us principles that suggest the loss of social security benefits will yield strong emotional and/or litigious responses, with the potential for carry-over into the private pension sphere.[7] To summarize why this is likely to occur: (1) individuals—using the status quo as their reference point—tend to view change as either a gain or a loss from the status quo; (2) “[s]ince losses loom larger [people feel them… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Aiming to correct past injustices and provide closure to individuals and communities affected by cultural theft, efforts to identify and return stolen heritage goods to their owners of origin have gained spotlight recently. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
That is why, even in a more traditional encampment context (e.g., camping in parks where overnight camping is permitted), regulators often impose limits on how close people can camp to sensitive environmental areas (such as waterways) and limits on how many people can occupy a camp, and for how long.Again, that interest, while not often discussed, would be seen to be of obvious importance near medical facilities, where clean [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:09 am
In 2019, a California Court of Appeal explored this facet of the statute when granting a Workplace Violence Restraining Order that protected any current employee of the employer seeking the order in People v. [read post]