Search for: "People v Jamal Green"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:13 pm
The concept of an anti-canon in constitutional law was developed a few years back (by Richard Primus, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, among others, and more recently by Akhil Amar and Jamal Greene). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm
Ferguson (separate is equal); Lochner v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
While politics is important, America is a legalistic country, and the collective views of the legal profession will also have a large impact on the future vitality of the twentieth century legacy -- and this is a good place to further develop the implications of Jamal Greene's insightful analysis. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:35 am
(Jamal Greene's "Selling Originalism" deals with this and I hope to return to talk more about his article one of these days.) [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
Waryck, Constitutional Redemption and Constitutional Faith: Introduction Sanford Levinson, How I Lost My Constitutional Faith Jamal Greene, Fourteenth Amendment Originalism Aziz Rana, Freedom Struggles and the Limits of Constitutional Continuity Gerald Torres and Lani Guinier, The Constitutional Imaginary: Just Stories About We the People Mark A. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
Jamal Greene has an insightful essay over at Slate on the Supreme Court’s role in ruling on ACA’s constitutionality. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Circuit opinion of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Collins.But all that said, innocent people getting framed by the cops, innocent people getting convicted and sentenced to die, innocent people getting executed, those are the eggs broken for the omelet. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
If the thirty-one essays in SCOTUSblog’s series on John Paul Stevens convey any message in unison, it is that the retired Justice believes in definite limits on the role of a judge (Frederick Schauer, Rodger Citron, Andrew Siegel, Jamal Greene, Joseph Thai, James Liebman). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
As Jamal Greene has detailed in these pages, Justice Stevens has successfully re-framed the Court’s conceptual framework for personal freedom from a general “privacy” right, which is not mentioned explicitly in the Constitution, to a “liberty” right, which is prominently and explicitly protected in the Constitution. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:30 pm
(coauthored with Stephen Ansolabehere and crossposted) Upon the initiative of my colleague Jamal Greene who has been writing about the popularity of originalism, our July survey included several questions concerning judicial methodology. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:32 am
(coauthored with Stephen Ansolabehere and crossposted) Upon the initiative of my colleague Jamal Greene who has been writing about the popularity of originalism, our July survey included several questions concerning judicial methodology. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:38 pm
At the time of Texas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
In both Abu-Jamal's and Frank G. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
On broader issues, Jamal Greene, guest-posting at Balkinization, discusses the success of originalism as a conservative intellectual movement and argues that progressive intellectuals cannot expect to effect similar doctrinal changes. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
One was Norman Green. [read post]
