Search for: "People v James Price"
Results 21 - 40
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 2:14 am
IPWatchdog answers this with reference to the case of Persion Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
The court summarizes: The record may demonstrate that, on a regular basis…, prospective customers try to bargain with LVSA based on pricing found on Groupon. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
And the Court paid a heavy price for its disobedience to the Constitution’s text, history, structure, and correctly decided precedent: The first ruling that deviated from Hylton—Pollock v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
The Court also reversed the judgment in People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am
v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
See Mazza v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
First, the numerator is individual people, while the denominator is ad impressions. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
