Search for: "People v Khan"
Results 21 - 40
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Pictures are being shared on social media of the leaflets which say Khan Younis is a “dangerous combat zone” and directs people to travel to shelters in nearby Rafah. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
He found that getting prominent real estate on a web browser or mobile phone discourages people from switching to rival search engines. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
In People v Byrnes (1948), it was held that public trial means that it is not restricted to any particular class of the community but is freely open to all. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
The case is Khan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia stressed in Verizon v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
People who don’t know about secret surveillance can’t challenge it in court. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
As Olesya Khromenyuk, a Ukrainian historian, explained in the New York Times last year, most people “didn’t imagine Ukraine at all” before February 2022 and many still conjure up “caricatures based not on knowledge of the country or the people who inhabit it but on mythology. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 1:08 pm
Khan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Third, there is the case of Imran Khan v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
