Search for: "People v Lackey" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2008, 9:49 am
The charge stems from a meeting on 3/15/07 where Zach, Dickie Scruggs, Backstrom, Patterson and Balducci met and discussed Balducci's relationship with Judge Lackey and at the meeting it was decided that Balducci would speak to Judge Lackey about making a favorable ruling for defendants in Jones v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
  What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
[SECOND UPDATE: So many people have been asking for it, and here it is: click here for a pdf of the Jones v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am by Madelaine Lane
  Additionally, the Court remanded the case of People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
Often these were people who were illiterate or uneducated. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
Now, let's consider a few things, as follows:Judge Lackey and other Lafayette County judges recused themselves from the Jones v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
I do not know if these people are just stupid or merely lying. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  Although he had exhausted his claim based on Lackey v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 14-292, in presenting a so-called Lackey claim that long delay in imposing the death penalty during the pendency of appeals and collateral challenges violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:44 am by Benjamin Wittes
— Anne-Marie Slaughter (@SlaughterAM) October 17, 2015 Putin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
On the downside: terrible network latency.Crypto Anarchy: Sean Hastings and Ryan Lackey came out of a tradition that prized better living through cryptography. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
 Many people, after all, are arrogant -- lawyers, as a class, are plagued by a high percentage of people who are insufferably arrogant, vain and full of false notions about their own preeminence. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm by Ilya Somin
Mistake #2: Depriving people of the chance to have a stake in the organization. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Texas, 14-292, involving a quadruple homicide from so long ago that people still thought I had promise. [read post]