Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 2:45 am
A full report on Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKL 36 will follow in due course, but for those of you who simply can’t wait for your fix of House of Lords homelessness judgments, the headline is that both appeals are allowed to limited extents. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Original Supreme Court decision However, the House of Lords allowed the appeal by a majority of 3 to 2 in R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2) [2008] UKHL 61. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:33 am
Regina (Baiai and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “Speeches July 30, 2008 The statutory scheme requiring the permission of the Secretary of State for the Home Department for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry protected by article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
(See Rogers v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:20 am
Lord Neuberger gave the only judgment. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
Great Hall of the People ChongqingAuthor flyerletian Licence CCO 1.0 Soutce Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Peter Jackson, Arnold and Phillips) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 947 (11 July 2022)This was an appeal from the judgment of HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the High Court in Nokia [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:35 am
I'm catching up here on a House of Lords judgment I missed a few weeks ago in October. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissented. [read post]
