Search for: "People v March"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
However, it was not until March 11, 2008, that notice of filing the notice of appeal was mailed. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
(People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
" Add to that to an earlier transcription that read (as described in today's opinion): "The People also look to Mitchell v[.] [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
And since it doesn't get you much these days to have a scrip, we shouldn't expect people to have it in any event. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
But that's very much not the case here; COVID kills people, but in no universe does it end American democracy. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:41 pm
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
.' He went on to explain that the 'bombers are the people who direct the incident away from the person who actually did the stabbing and cutting,' allowing the prisoners with weapons, called 'hitters,' to get away while the bombers continue to attack the victim without weapons. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:32 pm
I've heard of people saying that they do lots of things "for medicinal purposes," but never heard of anyone saying that for porn. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm
With people who are actually trained to sniff this stuff out. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
On March 12, 2018, Moine sought medical care at an urgent care clinic in Loma Linda, hoping to secure a refill of his medications. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:01 am
Prior to his commitment offense, Townsend also had an arson conviction in March 2006.Following his commitment offense, when he was a patient at a state hospital in 2008, Townsend sent a letter to a neighbor stating that he had placed 40 Molotov cocktails on her property. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
I expect that there are lots of "normal" people, like me, who violate it. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:10 pm
" Why is it so critical that he be excluded from the strip mall -- sure, I'm sure the people there would rather not see him, but as long as he's not burning anything or annoying anyone, what's the harm? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from outside. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:56 pm
I just came across this March 6, 2011, article in Copyright Litigation Blog, indicating that Justia Blawgsearch had ranked "Recording Industry vs The People" as #2 among the "Top 50 Copyright Blogs of All Time", right under the highly respected "IPKat". [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
Which means that the California Supreme Court is of the view that it wouldn't be an "arbitrary classification" to seek the death penalty solely against people whose victims were related to police officers. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
It doesn't like that it's compelled to do so, and notes that it has "sent a number of people to prison for first degree murder for less than the sentence" it felt it had to impose here. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:37 am
The next day, former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez responded, stating that the reform is not conducive to job creation and foreign investment and will affect young people adversely. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
What the fuck is wrong with you people? [read post]
