Search for: "People v McClure"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 8:34 pm
In holding that the Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex, the Court relied on the precedent of Eisenstadt v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
” He had been a highly respected federal judge, and the author of an important antitrust, antimonopoly opinion, Addyston Pipe and Steel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
Contact Sheriff Ken McClure in Sac County for further information. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
R (on the application of McClure and Moos) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 12. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:14 am
R (on the application of Hannah McClure and Joshua Moos) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 12 – Read judgment The Metropolitan Police has succeeded in its appeal against a Divisional Court ruling (see previous post) that the use of crowd control measures – in this case, containment or “kettling” – against Climate Camp protesters did not constitute “lawful police operations”. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Reader Ted McClure pointed me to an interesting post on the subject on the MuslimLawProf blog (written by Prof. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:35 am
Remember Rudovsky v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
On 14 April 2011, the High Court of England and Wales ruled, in R (on the application of Joshua Moos and Hannah McClure) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, that the police had acted unlawfully in “containing” (aka kettling) certain G20 protestors on 1 April 2009. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:50 am
Back in State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
There’s more about the technical project and the people behind it from Jeni Tennison, technical lead and main developer (at TSO), on her blog. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
The following is from Byrum v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:31 pm
Dave McClure of the US Internet Industry Association (USIIA) seconded this point powerfully: If such vast data is retained, it will be abused. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:19 am
Back in State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
But in her recent ruling, McClure noticed a "distinguishable" difference between that case (Houser v. [read post]
