Search for: "People v McGovern" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
In the McGovern-Dole era, about 1 in 50 people received food stamps. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:25 am by Russell Jackson
Once again, my friend Andrew Trask has beaten me to the punch with a post -- this time about Judge Richard Posner's decision in McReynolds v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
(My own view competed the next day in a Boston Globe op-edwith Congressman Jim McGovern, the lead sponsor of the People’s Rights Amendment.) [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm by Lovechilde
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:12 am by Mark S. Humphreys
How a loss of consortium claim works as it relates to an insurance policy claim was discussed in a 1987, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Ella Jo McGovern v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am by Charon QC
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain and should be bound by its terms" (People v McGovern, 265 AD2d 881, lv denied 94 NY2d 882). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780,783 (1992); People v Thompson, 91 AD2d 672 (2nd Dept. 1982), modified 60 NY2d 513 (1983); People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 (2nd Dept. 1982). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of Computer Coordinator's disability/failure-to accommodate claim3rd Circuit>> McGovern v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
In November 2006 McGovern J. ruled in the High Court that Ireland's constitutional protection of "the unborn" does not include embryos outside the womb.The full decision is now available on BAILII:M.R. v T.R. and Others [2006] IEHC 359 (15 November 2006)www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2006/H359.htmlThe earlier High Court case wasM.R. v T.R. [2006] IEHC 221 (18 July 2006)[tinyurl.com]Sample News Story:Legislation prospect after embryo… [read post]