Search for: "People v Mohammad" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
   (The judge’s opinion is a part of the Circuit Court’s ruling in Esmail v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:48 pm by Karen Gullo
” For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/sanchez-v-ladot-opening-appellage-briefpdf Contact:  JenniferLynchSurveillance Litigation Directorjlynch@eff.org [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 5:00 am
Mohammad Ahsan, who was recently prosecuted in U.S.A. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
Giventhat main argument for anti-cow slaughter legislations has been to safeguardthe right of individual States to further their agricultural interests as theydeem fit, there is no reason why the people in Gujarat or Karnataka cannotpossess and consume beef imported from States where cow slaughter is permitted.Since such an import of beef does not interfere with Gujarat’s right to promoteagriculture by preventing the slaughter of cow within its boundaries, there isno nexus between the… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by JURIST Staff
Section 295-C of the PPC is undeniably the most contentious clause as it perpetuates the death penalty for defiling the name of the Prophet Mohammad. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media A survey carried by Amnesty International interviewing 550 young people aged 13-24 across 45 countries about their social media use reported praise about the opportunities for activism and diversity of ideas. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
The decision in Holder v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Mohammad Fadel
v=P4PnKJGJz1k&feature=youtube_gdata_player February 4. 2011   Mohammad Fadel Assistant Professor of Law University of Toronto Faculty of Law February 7, 2011   In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The appeal was allowed in Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
  In Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority (DPA) raised concerns that the Covid-19 track and trace software, called “Smittestopp,” poses a disproportionate threat to user privacy — including by continuously tracking and uploading people’s GPS location to a national database for half a year. [read post]