Search for: "People v Paul David Martin" Results 21 - 40 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times that in this morning’s conference, the justices will consider whether to hear City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
The court’s third living retiree, David H. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Carter-Ruck partner Guy Martin’s interview on LBC can be listened to here. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
David Walliams and Martin Clunes have settled damages claims over phone hacking allegations  by receiving “substantial compensation” and a public apology, after bringing legal action against the publisher of The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and The People. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahonMisconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori ChambersThe Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan SwaingerMy Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald FysonThe Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
  Even some of the people involved in the drafting of California’s Senate Bill 94 (“SB 94?) [read post]