Search for: "People v Peters"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
This works to bury the sovereign debt owed to First Nations Peoples and licenses the accumulation of further debt through criminalisation of Aboriginal people and the licensing of extractive violence against their lands and waters. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The trial was recently the center of TV series “The People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
However, the day after its approval, this ordinance was stopped in court by a lawsuit led by Peter Schey and known as League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
Dissatisfied, both parties appealed to the Supreme People’s Court which reached its decision in December 2023 (then published in January 2024). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am
Fischbarg, 9 NY3d at 377; see generally Eberhardt v G & J Contr., Inc., 188 AD3d 1653, 1654 [4th Dept 2020]; Peters v Peters, 101 AD3d 403, 403-404 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Mary Sledmere [2007] Peter Collier Ch. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
No people were injured in the incident. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
No people were injured in the incident. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
The case may be better understood as a political gesture, operationalizing the “promise” made in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
