Search for: "People v Plato" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 1:35 pm by Tom Smith
Unless you're going to be satisfied in the end with fuzzy thinking that ends up in bromides about Plato and Aristotle, you're going to be sucked in to the gyre of what really happened, what people actually thought in the infinitely complex historical past. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
How many people have been found innocent —or instead held responsible— for accusations that could be re-read differently? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm by Chris Green
Among people who take the question seriously, there is surely room for those who agree with the ancients – whether Plato in the Symposium or Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:11 – in recognizing more fluidity to sexual orientation than does the Court. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:41 am by Rick Hills
As Plato said (paraphrasing Republic V:473-c): "until fiscal federalists make con law, or con law scholars study fiscal federalism, ... cities will never have rest from their evils. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This post explores that point further; in particular how emphasis on technology, rather than people, falls short of that aim. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am by INFORRM
Plaintiffs suing for defamation seek to protect their reputation – what other people think of them, as Lord Denning (pic) defined it in Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm by The Charge
  Plato was not alone in assuming consent by silence. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm by Adam Thierer
Judge Richard Posner used similar logic when penning the 7th Circuit’s 2001 decision in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
“Plagiarism, which many people commonly think has to do with copyright, is not in fact a legal doctrine. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
I won't quite say that the brain-in-a-vat issue is exactly raised in the Supreme Court case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
")  Going back to Plato and the Gorgias, Socrates disting [read post]