Search for: "People v Polo" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
Polo Ass’n, Inc., which favored the putative infringer, but the key issue there was the rules of evidence, not trademark; but in Playtex Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
  * Privacy in focus: urban life watching is art in New York StateValentina writes on Foster v Svenson, an Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court decision regarding people taking pictures of their neighbours. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:52 pm
 Sure, maybe the weekend renters wear prefer tee-shirts and sneakers to polo shirts and boat shoes. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
IP: the "no-patents round-up for non-techie people" -- today's conference organised by CLT and hosted in London's Grange Fitzrovia Hotel -- was opened by James Tumbridge (Pillsbury), speaking on trade mark and trade dress protection. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
A second victim was taken to the hospital to [be treated] for a gunshot wound to his left ankle.Witnesses described the shooter as a black male wearing a striped polo shirt. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am by Afro Leo
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Larry Bache
JM Family Enters., 66 So.3d 336, 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
It is reported that Guantanamo inmate Shaker Aamer is to sue the British Government for defamation on the basis that US interrogators were supplied with “knowingly false information” by the UK security services, including the allegation that Mr Aamer was paid directly by Bin Laden and that he also recruited people to fight for al-Qaeda in Afghanistan Naomi Campbell is to pursue a libel claim against the Daily Telegraph, concerning an article about her involvement in an… [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:14 pm by Ron Coleman
Polo Ass’n, Inc., which favored the putative infringer, but the key issue there was the rules of evidence, not trademark; but in Playtex Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
  She also admitted she gave “the same customer eleven boys' Polo shirts [valued at $385] without any payment” because “she was trying to make people happy. [read post]