Search for: "People v. Acevedo" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 6:02 pm
Conducting surveillance on the communications of innocent people as described in the proposed bill is a disproportionate and unnecessary measure in a democratic society where the rule of law must be respected. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:55 pm
.- De nuestra consideración: Las organizaciones firmantes manifiestan un llamado de alerta respecto al Proyecto de Ley "Que establece la obligación de conservar  datos de tráfico", presentado por los Senadores Fernando Silva Facetti,  Roberto Acevedo, Arnaldo Giuzzio y Arnoldo Wiens. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Acevedo) criticizing the Court’s warrant requirement, citing Akhil Amar and . . . [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:33 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The editors want to expand the conversation to include citizens as well as law students in order to empower people to speak up against perceived prejudice and unfairness. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm by Michael Lowe
In February 2014, hundreds of people in San Antonio, Texas, got letters from the Federal Bureau of Investigation informing them that there had been a federal wiretap on the phone of attorney Al Acevedo, Jr., as part of a sting operation into judicial bribery and that “… you, or someone using a telephone on which you are the listed subscriber, were intercepted pursuant to a series of federally authorized wiretaps between August 20, 2013, and November 15, 2013. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[Abstract]. 58 Villanova Law Review 371-470 (2013).Symposium:  Law, Religion, and Lautsi v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
At issue before the Court of Appeals recently was the question whether a defendant could - by sacrificing an illegally lenient sentence on a prior conviction - remove a predicate conviction by effectively moving his conviction date from before the current crime was comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifmitted to after.The answer under the facts in this case was no (People v Acevedo, 2011 NY Slip Op 05582 [decided June 30, 2011]). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:20 am by Gabe Acevedo
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Wal-Mart v. [read post]