Search for: "People v. Acuff" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
The unpublished nature of the work undermines that in some measure (see, e.g., Harper & Row v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Weapon parody, however, is what most other people would call a satire. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Mitch Stoltz and Parker Higgins
Acuff-Rose Music ("Whether ... parody is in good taste or bad does not and should not matter to fair use") and Yankee Publishing Inc. v. [read post]