Search for: "People v. Aikens" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 12:17 am
The paper has, of course, long been running a campaign to open up the family courts (I wonder how many people will still be following their campaign after June?). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am by Melissa L. Greipp
The primary brief challenging the death penalty for those cases was actually filed in Aikens v. [read post]
Aikens LJ and Simon J, [2014] EWHC 4167 (Admin) described Pham as “a British resident” and dismissed his appeal; the court held at para 91 that in its “view whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant article 6 rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:24 am by Lovechilde
  Or if this were V-J day and a sailor’s kiss said it all. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 20-21 January… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick, Aikens and Black LJJ) will give judgment in the libel costs case of Henry v NGN. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]