Search for: "People v. Atkinson" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
17 May 2013, 6:10 am by Jamison Koehler
” The key case in Maryland on this doctrine is Atkinson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This sentiment was supported by Justice Binnie in R. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:41 am by Steve Bainbridge
Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine's opinion in Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” In that case, Judge Atkinson accepted that “the family courts in particular have generally welcomed McKenzie Friends. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In the words of Lord Atkinson in Adam v.Ward [1917] AC 309 at 334. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 1 April 2024, the Scottish Hate Crime and Public Order Act came into effect, extending protections to minorities, including transgender people, who are currently not covered by the law against those ‘stirring up hatred’. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Rather, a journalist should not be penalised for making a wrong decision on a question of meaning on which different people might reasonably take different views. [read post]