Search for: "People v. Barton" Results 21 - 40 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
For example, in Barton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Barton: Spain gave a national registration to Matratzen for mattresses, even though it’s generic in Germany. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
  If 11 people keep asking me hour after hour to explain my view, and I feel like I've done so more than competently, I may well react negatively to them saying things like (as here) "Just tell me yes or no . . . . [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
  And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
" He included the same nomenclature in Barton v. [read post]