Search for: "People v. Bassett" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by George Lenard
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Hall
John Edward Green, Jr., the defendant in Texas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 2:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In three of the criminal appeals (People v Bean, 2009 NY Slip Op 06947 [4th Dept 10/2/09]; People v Laing, 2009 NY Slip Op 06906 [4th Dept 10/2/09]; People v Parks, 2009 NY Slip Op 06995 [4th Dept 10/2/09] the Court noted that the trial attorney had failed to renew the motion for a trial order of dismissal (TOD motion) as has been required, at least since the 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Hines,97 NY2d 56,… [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Bassett (2008 NY Slip Op 07729 [10/3/08]) the Fourth Department held that there was no error in allowing the People to present the testimony of a witness concerning child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS) without first conducting a Frye hearing. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
In both People v Martin (2008 NY Slip Op 07281 [10/3/08]) and People v Dickerson(2008 NY Slip Op 07310 [10/3/08]) the certificate inaccurately reflected the length of the sentence imposed.Finally, in People v Bassett (2008 NY Slip Op 07729 [10/3/08]) the certificate listed a higher level offense than that for which the defendant had been convicted. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]