Search for: "People v. Baxter"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 10:29 am
Ok, maybe it is not that extreme, but in the case of Doe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:31 pm
As discussed in this article by Kate Moser in The Recorder, the case, People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
By Tom Kaufman: Arias v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Belisle v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:35 am
In an opinion that the medical marijuana community has long been waiting for, the California Supreme Court held in City of Riverside v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
Eric Baxter is Senior Counsel at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Washington, D.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
Frazer (1999) 21 Cal.4th 737, 775, fn. 32 [Court requested supplemental post-argument briefing regarding a statute’s constitutionality]; People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm
I had the pleasure of working with Kirk and Celeste during the certification hearings for the National Indian Residential Schools class action, Baxter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:24 pm
" Baxter Int'l v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
Savings & Loan Assn. v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
Street commerce in drugs and sex forces innocent people to share their neighborhoods with pimps, prostitutes, and drug dealers who use their streets as a bazaar for illegal transactions. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Baxter. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
And, notwithstanding the harsh language of those foul-mouthed justices on the Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court had never used the term in print.Until Thursday, that is.Justice Baxter pulled the trigger in the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
