Search for: "People v. Camden"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Court of Appeal, in Etherton LJ's sole judgment, held that Camden's argument that s.176 did no more than identify the group of people against whom suitability was to be assessed was wrong. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Court of Appeal, in Etherton LJ's sole judgment, held that Camden's argument that s.176 did no more than identify the group of people against whom suitability was to be assessed was wrong. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 12:37 pm
And there are older precedents supporting that, too: People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
Hounslow argued that decisions on provision of social housing can only be challenged by way of judicial review, citing O’Rourke v Camden LBC [1998] A.C. 188, in which the House of Lords struck out a claim for damages for a failure to accommodate as homeless pursuant to s.63(1) Housing Act 1985. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Lord Chief Justice Camden in Entick v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Defendant Figueroa was a Camden police officer who, along with other officers, planted drugs on and stole money from people he arrested. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
The Facts A group of Deliveroo riders (“the Riders”) working in the Camden and Kentish town area of London became members of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (“the IWGB”). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
The House of Lords in O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, and the court of appeal in X v Hounslow found no duty of care in Part VII and Part VI Housing Act 1996 obligations, or their previous equivalents. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
He previously was a Visiting Professor at Rutgers School of Law-Camden. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Wilkes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:21 am
See Danforth v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:10 am
Since both Normans and Goths were Germanic peoples, the Franks might well have referred the Normans as "Visigoths" with the expression bigot. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
