Search for: "People v. Chambers (1998)"
Results 21 - 40
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2022, 11:30 am
In a detailed judgment, HHJ Backhouse held: “in chambers” meant the kind of hearing that under the County Court Rules 1981 would have been heard in chambers (rather than in open court), even though the term was not used in the CPR from 1998 onwards. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
The newspaper and website were viewed by millions of people. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Wouter Vandenhole; and Jingjing Zhang Pursuant to the Section Registrar’s notification dated 25 March 2021 that the President of the Chamber (Fourth Section) had granted permission under Rule 44 § 5 of the Rules of the European Court of Human Rights Duarte Agostinho and others v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
The court reviewed certain authorities that have grappled with this problem, including: McKennit v Ash [2005] EWHC 3003 (see [81]); Rocknroll v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (see [21] and [25]); and Mosley v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 687, where Eady J observed: “Nevertheless, a point may be reached where the information sought to be restricted, by order of the Court is so widely and generally accessible ‘in the public… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:10 am
Hence, the battle lines are drawn: Sink/Individuals v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Judgments are awaited in a number of Grand Chamber cases Morice v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
Emma Foubister is a trainee barrister at Matrix Chambers [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
It could have been used to identify very large numbers of people and to track their movements around the country. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
S.H. and Others v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN is entitled to publish articles criticising people in the public eye. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
For example, in the 1998 Blumenthal v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
J., in chambers) (quoting New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
The rubric is the warning that traditionally appears at the top of a judgment telling people what they can and can’t do with it. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
Many of the claimants were friends or family of the famous people targeted by journalists. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
The pleaded causes of action were libel, harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. [read post]
