Search for: "People v. Christian (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 5:13 am
Cook the first time it was raised when the Ohio legislature passed its version of Megan’s law in 1996, and again in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm by Mitchell Silverman
§ 7, enacted in 1996, is unconstitutional; and in another order, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
A woman’s right to terminate pregnancy was litigated in Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health in 1998, where the Constitutional Court held that section 12 would permit a woman to elect to terminate a pregnancy within the time frames set out in the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1996. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 12:58 pm
Moreover, her children were Christian Orthodox and could only attend the Eritrean Orthodox church in Southwark. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Let me turn to the role of minority faiths and particularly minority persecuted Christian faiths. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 101 F.3d 239, 242 (2nd Cir. 1996); Al-Adsani v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
Reports of scientific and academic conferences are brought within existing qualified privilege provisions of the Defamation Act 1996. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
” He quoted an email claiming that “[m]ost thinking people believe that the European, Christian victory over the Moorish, Islamic (and African) culture in Spain is an example of a victory of a ‘backward’ culture over one that was more civilized. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
Background In Mr B Randall v Trent College Ltd & Ors [2023] UKET 2600288/2020, before the Employment Tribunal he claimed: harassment contrary to s.26 Equality Act 2010; direct discrimination on grounds of religion or religious or other philosophical belief contrary to s.13; victimisation contrary to s.27; and unfair dismissal contrary to s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Goff, 92 F.3d 419, 423 (6th Cir. 1996); Vandiver v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by GuestPost
According to established case law, it is not necessary in this respect to find that the provision in question does in practice affect a substantially higher proportion if Travellers, it is sufficient that it is liable to have such an effect (ECJ C-237/94 O’Flynn v Adjudication Officer [1996] ECR-I-02617 para 20,21). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm by Amanda Beck
San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders may have provided some of the most important testimony in Perry v. [read post]