Search for: "People v. Cohen"
Results 21 - 40
of 941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
The increase in sales was found to be stronger for less popular books and even spilled over to a digitized author’s nondigitized works Keyword Ads * Cohen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
Noyb claim that X used the political and religious views of their users to determine whether people should or should not see an ad campaign by the EU Commission’s Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — REGIONAL RESPONSE The Israeli military (IDF) said in a post on X it is reviewing a strike that harmed Lebanese troops in south Lebanon, following reports that an Israeli shelling killed a Lebanese soldier and wounded three people on Monday. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:33 am
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
This proportion was significantly higher than results from a survey of healthy people, in which 24% reported eating frozen berries in the week before they were interviewed. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The proposal would lower the cap, according to people familiar with the matter. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
A couple of quick notes on cases that have been sitting a browser tabs in my ‘to do’ window for far too long… Daff v Gyalui & Aiach-Cohen (2023) UKUT 134 (LC) Ms Daff had been ordered to pay an RRO for an unlicensed property to the tenants in the amount of £22,230, being 100% of rent for 9 months. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:11 am
¶¶ 148–49; accord Friel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
All the wrong people will celebrate. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 2:40 pm
The decision strikes me as quite consistent with First Amendment precedents, such as Cohen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
To help her do that, she has already made two key hires for the Legal Innovation Lab, naming Sam Moore as director of innovation and Karol V. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
