Search for: "People v. Davey"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Davey, Joseph Dillon. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:08 am
Davey, upholding a Washington state scholarship program that excluded students who were pursuing a degree in devotional theology. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 6:51 pm
Davey, in my class on the First Amendment, and I worried about how I was going to teach that case. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Davey changes the baseline rule. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:11 am
Davey, upholding a Washington State scholarship program that excluded students who were pursuing a degree in devotional theology. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
” Yes, he is proposing eviction and homelessness as an ‘incentive to work’, regardless of people’s situation. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
It compared the case to Locke v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:35 am
Davey was dismissed from the jury. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
This is where the excellent Francis Davey -- a noted contributor of wise and generally rectificatory comments on other people's weblogs -- comes in. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
Sullivan to Regan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Media organisations reported this aspect in the context of other legal activity around internet “trolls“, in rather a muddled fashion – as Francis Davey points out here, and Padraig Reidy noted here. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
I look forward to it.oh and Ps as for Newzbin (no 2), read Francis Davey's great summary here . [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
It is already trite knowledge that more young people are streaming content than downloading it - as easy, less risk. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
Davey got this so wrong. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:58 am
In the case of Media CAT Ltd v Adams & Ors [2011] EWPCC 10, Media CAT accused several people of infringing pornographic material. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
There’s more about the technical project and the people behind it from Jeni Tennison, technical lead and main developer (at TSO), on her blog. [read post]
