Search for: "People v. Duane" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
 The proscription in the title or this post is slightly more limited (federal agents) and based not on the Constitution, but on a particular federal statute: 18 USC § 1001.In New York, for example, the police are permitted to lie to you (“we got your fingerprints on the murder weapon,” “we've got a video of you leaving the 7-11,” “your codefendant is saying it was all you, he didn’t do anything,”) in order to get you to tell the truth, so long… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:35 am by Arina Shulga
As we recently found out from the CA Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But we don’t just use the internet to transmit stuff about goods/things people have legal rights in. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Jeff Gamso
  Of course, there aren't that many cases like Buck v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Jeff Gamso
  Of course, there aren't that many cases like Buck v. [read blog]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
The chief justice wrote, “Our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
Charles Duan asked whether patents protect national security. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKInsurance LawAppraisal Panel Wrongly Awarded Duane Reade $4.3 Million in 'Extended Period' Loss on WTC Store Duane Reade Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:44 pm
And now, to add to this list, we have Duane Forehand, former Staff Sergeant in the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:18 pm by Jason
Duane Morris also reports about a Massachusetts case, DeGiacomo v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:21 am by Tyson Snow
Duane Forrester (@duaneforrester / web: http://www.bing.com/webmaster). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is South Dakota v. [read post]