Search for: "People v. Faulkner" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Faulkner case: don’t assert infringement based on fragments of a work. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:51 pm
The NCAA 2010-2011 Division I Manual does not appear to discuss Social Media/Social Networking Monitoring and/or censorship so I am not sure how any NCAA institution thinks that it is acceptable to monitor and then censor its student-athletes.In Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Jasmine Joseph
In fact, the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples requires that states acquired the free and informed consent of Indigenous governments and people before taking action detrimental to those peoples, giving rise to a kind of literal consent theory and practice desperately needed in American Indian affairs.Justice Scalia and the Art of RhetoricJeffrey M. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:39 am by Rakesh Madhava
Check back next week for my follow-up post, “The Software Code of Law: Lawyers v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
 The company says it will now make changes to the service, which lets IT administrators “help their people get the most” from its products, in order to limit the amount of information about individual employees that is shared with managers. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
    This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]