Search for: "People v. Fletcher"
Results 21 - 40
of 268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
In the courtroom today for 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in Hurley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:51 am
The Native American Experience through Poetry, the Law, and MemoirWriters: Louis V. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm
Only a few people elsewhere in the courtroom are doing so. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:33 am
Fletcher and Singel’s paper, “Lawyering the Indian Child Welfare Act,” has been published in the Michigan Law Review. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:36 am
(3) The judges on the panel are Judges Fletcher, Ikuta and Bress. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:27 am
Just like enemies of the people do. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
Fletcher and Wenona T. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:34 am
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:56 pm
” The health care vaccine case In the second case, Biden v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
“Carry a gun outside the home is a fundamental right that people in 43 other states enjoy. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 7:05 am
Fletcher and Singel have posted “Lawyering the Indian Child Welfare Act,” forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review‘s upcoming symposium on civil rights lawyering. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
KF8215.75 .R69 2018 Royster, Judith V. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Fletcher, Foundation Professor of Law & Director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law -- Nomos and Anishinaabe Inaakonigewin M. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:35 am
Many legal scholars have written on this issue but none as much as Chief Justice Marshall in Johnson v. [read post]