Search for: "People v. Forsyth" Results 21 - 40 of 103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
No, the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content (fact-checking) or who belong to a specific organization of writers (the International Fact-Checking Network) to register and provide a bond before speaking—just as the government can't require people who engage in speech with a specific sort of content to pay extra money for police protection (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And just as parade organizers can't be required to pay a security fee that's based on how controversial the parade's message is (Forsyth County v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Anthony Forsyth, Professor of Workplace Law, RMIT University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:21 am by Eugene Volokh
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Searching for Volunteer Jurors The Winston Salem Journal reported on February 27, 2018 that due to a glitch in Forsyth County, NC, jury summonses to 1,700 people failed to get mailed. [read post]