Search for: "People v. Garcia (1996)"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, now codified as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
On Friday 20 June 2014 Bean J heard the PTR in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Garcia, 20 NY3d 317 [2012]). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
Morgan, 88 F.3d 620, 625-26 (8th Cir. 1996); Nilson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
See People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Garcia, 94 F.3d 57 (2nd Cir. 1996). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
We can solve the cycling problem by drawing an analogy here to Garcia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
I concluded by noting that the Fourth Department last cited Delgado as a basis for reducing a negotiated sentence in 1996 in People v Sanchez (225 AD2d 1085 [4th Dept 1996]), in which the Court reduced a negotiated sentence from 8 1/3 year to life to 3 years to life. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Garcia, the statute of limitations apply with equal force to section 1983 method-of-execution action; 2) the limitations period begins to accrue on the date direct review of a plaintiff's conviction and sentence is complete; 3) the district court correctly found that the statute of limitations has run for each of the three remaining plaintiffs; and 4) there was no reason to hold that the statute of limitations has been tolled. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Supreme Court, April 23, 2008 Virginia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
