Search for: "People v. Garnier"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Henderson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
–Garnier v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
Buentello v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 3:47 pm
Pulsifer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
July 6, 2020) People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:14 pm
From today's decision in Garnier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
Konrath; see also Garnier v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
Gradually, most people collect their belongings and, in some cases, their children, and head quietly for home, clearly stunned. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am
This is a lawsuit brought by Twitter users and the Knight Foundation against President Trump (and his social media strategist and press secretary). [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
The UK litigation which led to the CJEU ruling in Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd [on which see Katnote here] might be said to be an example of an attempt to change the law succeeding; the assault on Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV and others [2007] EWCA Civ 364 in Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:36 am
Guido v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:42 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:12 pm
L’Oreal unsuccessfully argued that the plaintiffs did not warrant a class, citing Duke v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
It is what other people will smell. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
In answer to a question that people keep asking him, the IPKat does not yet know the exact form of the questions which the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, is proposing to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Nokia v HMRC (see earlier posts here and here), but you can be sure that, once he does know, he'll share the information with all his readers. [read post]
