Search for: "People v. General Motors Corp. (1978)"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
But it should be fairly reliable, and should thus diminish the damage that the AI program may do to people's reputations. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
Ford Motor Co.,573 F.2d 1332, 1339 (5th Cir.1978). [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Statements on matters of purely private concern do not fall within a generally unpr [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
We have very bright people on our side. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court—the case is called UJ-Eighty Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or (7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
P. 56(a); see also Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in an… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
