Search for: "People v. Good (1990)"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
A good example of a situation in which the five day period for a § 190.50 motion may be extended is provided by People v Prest, 105 AD2d 1078 [4th Dept 1984]. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Bailey, 558 So. 2d 858, 860 (Miss. 1990). [2] Moran v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
The right to counsel, if it exists, protects "bad" people as well as "good ones".But I'm confident Judge Pregerson would nonetheless have appreciated it if the underlying facts in this case were slightly different. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm
Here's proof in the pudding: In Jennifer Kaufman v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 11:41 am
So your decade of clean and good living is worth squat in deciding whether you deserve an expungement.Poppycock. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:54 am
People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
But over time, as more and more people in America have won the vote (which is a good thing!) [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
But over time, as more and more people in America have won the vote (which is a good thing!) [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
In 1990, the internet was not part of people’s daily lives to the extent that it is today. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm
[i] Burwell v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:34 am
Rite to Life people say she's pro-abortion. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
That’s not religious liberty; it’s religious triumphalism.Since 1990, when the Supreme Court surveyed its free exercise cases and concluded that neutral, generally applicable laws are subjected to rationality review under the First Amendment, in Employment Div. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
