Search for: "People v. Graves (2001)" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Paul Stephan
The 2001 Patriot Act later added this narrowly confined confiscation authority. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(c) Adjudge and declare that the Russian Federation’s recognition of the independenceof the so-called ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ and ‘Luhansk People’s Republic’ on22 February 2022 is based on a false claim of genocide and therefore has no basisin the Genocide Convention. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Kelly Goles
The novel is structured around the mythical and endless case, Jarndyce v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
’ (Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policymaking (Hart Publishing, 2001) p.101 and ch.5 generally). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Instead, it may be facts or evidence from which reasonable inferences may be drawn, beyond the mere proximity of two people themselves. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Shapiro & Julie Graves Krishnaswami, The Secret History of the Bluebook, 100 Minn. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am by Cory Doctorow
There are grave problems with this mandate, most notably that it does not provide for penalties for fraudulently or negligently misrepresenting yourself as being the proprietor of a copyrighted work. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]