Search for: "People v. Hall"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
But adds the following:"Lagunas argues: “Criminal courts are not supposed to be gambling halls where juries are faced with all or nothing verdicts. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:41 pm
If one doesn’t have the required intelligence, then it is not right for them… it would be like making exceptions and giving special treatment so ugly people can be supermodels. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:55 am
There may have been better ways of doing what went down here; in particular, the judge should have made sure to invite back the people waiting out in the hall as seats became available.But that doesn't mean that defendant gets a retrial. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court addressed that issue today in the context of probation violations in People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Ralph Edward Hall Jr. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm
The result would be a popular repudiation of Hall somewhat like the 11th Amendment’s repudiation of the 1793 decision Chisholm v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Trials are always about people. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
The UK High Court has today issued its judgment in the Vidal-Hall (and others v Google privacy case [2014] EWHC 13 (QB) The case could have significant impact on Google and other browsers and will be welcomed by privacy campaigners as reining in the wide scope to which Google and others put people's browsing data to use. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:32 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 1:16 am
As the Fourth Department, held in People v Hall, 2008 NY Slip Op 10361 [12/21/08], if such relief is not sought at the lower court, the issue is not preserved for review:defendant contends that the presentence report should be amended because, according to defendant, it contains inaccurate assertions and unsupported speculation that "are likely to prejudice [defendant] for years to come" (see generally People v Harrington, 3 AD3d 737, 739). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:53 am
On April 10, 2014, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in Sheehan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:26 am
“Transgender people’s rights are human rights,” said chief commissioner Barbara Hall. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm
” For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/knight-first-amendment-institute-v-trump For information about the lawsuit:https://knightcolumbia.org/content/knight-institute-v-trump-lawsuit-challenging-president-trumps-blocking-critics-twitter Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
In November 2012, he stole desserts from the dining hall. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
Trials are always about people. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:56 pm
On Tuesday evening, HBO's Costas NOW hosted a live town-hall program that attempted to analyze the changing face of sports media. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Part I tells the story of Colegrove v. [read post]
