Search for: "People v. Hall (2000)"
Results 21 - 40
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Rather, proper deference is to the community of experts, all of the people who have spent their careers and considerable talents accumulating knowledge in their field. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:04 am
Hall, 743 NE 2d 521 – Ill: Supreme Court 2000 The person who holds the privilege is the person who said whatever they said. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
” They made sacrifices in service of their community, in the same way that constitutions must serve the people. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
And indeed, sometimes a bad decision in a court produces a substantially good consequences in the arena of politics (theory discussed in Backer, Chroniclers in the Field of Cultural Production: Courts, Law, and the Interpretive Process Boston College Third World Law Journal 20:291-343 (2000). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Radiol. 597 (2000); Leonard Berlin, “Outcome Bias,” 183 Am. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:57 pm
Hall v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Since 2000, Congress has heard testimony on several ADA reform and notification bills, all of which laid the groundwork for H.R. 620. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am
” People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am
One year later, the Supreme Court decided Mazars v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
For example, in a 2000 case, Chief Judge Posner wrote that Congress could not modify the requirement "that the President [must] be at least 35 years old. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
The power to make knowledge claims v. the people who have been erased from/made invisible in our narratives. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Judicial interpretation,’ Bruce Ryder points out, [(1991), 29 Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 619] ‘prevent[ed] the provinces from enacting legislation that interfered with the rights of Asians to reside in the province and work as wage labourers, but otherwise, with minor exceptions, left discriminatory legislation intact. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
But you are not my people. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Had the two Houses been so disposed—surely they would not have been given that the House elected in 2000 was controlled by Republicans and the Senate was evenly split—they could by agreement have rejected the Florida electors in favor of a slate supporting Al Gore, had one been submitted.In addition, Bush v Gore, by its own terms, is never supposed to be used as precedent.Whatever Justice Barrett and her new colleagues may want, or try, to do, the outcome of the… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am
As they pointed out, just a few years earlier, in Kazemi Estate v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
