Search for: "People v. Heard (1993)" Results 21 - 40 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 8:43 am
The 1993 case of Carroll Air Systems v Greenbaum involved a business party with traveling sales staff and customers – the sales people at a 3-day event were encouraged to purchase drinks for Clients (to be reimbursed by the sales person as a business expense). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419.… [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:36 am by Margaret Wood
  There were a number of cases heard in the magistrates’ court of people violating this provision. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” (LVT Procedure (England) Regulations 2003, reg.20).Now, the LVT does not tell people this. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” (LVT Procedure (England) Regulations 2003, reg.20).Now, the LVT does not tell people this. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In the past few weeks, the Supreme Court has heard two cases that examine the role of Congress in ensuring voting rights: Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am by David Oscar Markus
Justice Department event marking the 50th anniversary of the high court's landmark Gideon v. [read post]