Search for: "People v. Hendricks"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
In Walker v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Hendricks , 521 U. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Under those circumstances, we conclude that defendant did not knowingly waive his right to appeal with respect to Supreme Court's denial of the request by defendant for youthful offender status at sentencing (see generally People v McCarthy, 83 AD3d 1533, lv denied 17 NY3d 819; People v Fehr, 303 AD2d 1039, lv denied 100 NY2d 538; People v Hendricks, 270 AD2d 944). [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
Bones of contention: Ali Hendrick's mark in Case O-307/11 Request for information. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm
The case which tells us how to do this is Katz v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:24 pm
Yesterday I blogged about Flores-Villar v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 357 (1997)). [read post]
27 May 2010, 1:45 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:02 am
In 1997, in Kansas v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:58 pm
” (NOTE: many people refer to the sections of the act as beginning with section 600. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:34 am
This accompanied the landmark decisions of O'Connor v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:28 am
The question in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
Dilks, Bankruptcy Attorney The Brad Hendricks Law Firm, P.A. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:02 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 28, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming bench verdict on minority fem cop's pro se race and retaliation/discharge claimØ Hendricks v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:49 am
Hendricks, which allows for the indefinite civil incarceration of sex offenders. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:41 am
In September 2008, the D.C. district court held in Schroer v. [read post]
