Search for: "People v. Holder"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
(part 2) The last post in this series[1] addressed how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their development relies on use of other people's creative works, often without notice or consent. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
These articles emphasize the obligation for both the SEP holder and the implementer to negotiate and finalize a license agreement in good faith under Article 7 of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
In Szalai v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
By Atreya Mathur In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
For example, in Atari Interactive, Inc., v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
The plaintiffs have not identified any basis for concluding that X Corp. was obligated to make its service worse for everyone, just to punish the people who misuse it. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Holder.) [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Thus, recognition of the right to same-sex marriage not only does not harm people who oppose same-sex marriage; it affirmatively benefits them.Expanding the circle of right-holders in other ways can also benefit existing right-holders who might think of themselves as harmed by that expansion. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
Under Lorillard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
All rights reserved,” denoting the exclusive rights of the copyright holders, the Andy Warhol Foundation, to the image, and Campbell Soup Co. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
”); and Rotkiske v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Ctr., 222 AD3d 1160; Matter of Aungst v Family Dollar, 221 AD3d 1222; and Matter of Holder v Office for People with Dev. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]