Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 21 - 40 of 31,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 12:55 pm
 To the elderly.The question is how many years in prison Doolittle properly receives. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
"Proof, I guess, that people in San Diego know how to have a good time. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:03 am by Jeanne M. Hannah
Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), there are some people who do NOT live in Vermont (the first state where civil unions were legalized by statute) who may wonder whether, where and how to dissolve... [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 2:33 pm
Here's a good example, the Wisconsin appeals court case of Kolve v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
  The fancy word wasn't just used to impress people; it fits perfectly. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:09 am
I have posted a new article, How New Genetic Technologies Will Transform Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:02 am by marcorandazza
Jon Katz has a thought provoking piece on how the U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07 am
(At least theoretically.)It's not really surprising how this one comes out. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
" But how many people have actually spent some time there? [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, this ground was without merit as a deficiency in the chain of custody did not affect the admissibility but only affected the weight of the evidence as stated in the People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d at 494. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:53 pm
On this point the People do not disagree and instead contend that both the trial court’s evidentiary rulings were correct. [read post]