Search for: "People v. Julian"
Results 21 - 40
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 11:52 am
Front Populaire pour la Libération de la Saguia-El-Hamra et Du Rio de Oro (Front Polisario) Marie Joseph Ayissi, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
Julian, 41 N.Y.2d at 343, 392 N.Y.S.2d 610, 360 N.E.2d 1310; Amaro v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
This Tuesday 14 July, from 5.30pm to 7pm, Australian practitioner Julian Gyngell will be addressing an informal meeting of the IP Finance blog group on the subject "Phonewords and Finance". [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The High Court has rejected Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s appeal against extradition to Sweden to face rape and sexual molestation charges. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:50 pm
Bishop-Burney, Prosecutor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
In Haaretz.com et al v Mitchell Goldhar (SCC case no. 37202), the Supreme Court of Canada is asked to decide whether the court in Ontario has jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim arising from an article widely published in Israel, but read online by a number of people in Canada. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
Julian 7. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:40 am
The Pink Pagoda is proprietary to the Bethune Institute of Canada and China, and was developed by people in the fields of intelligence and communications. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It is, of course, true that, after the horrors of the 1914-18 conflagration, many people wanted simply to avoid another war at all costs. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
However, judicial office holders who blog (or who post comments on other people’s blogs) must not identify themselves as members of the judiciary. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:31 am
On the 50th Anniversary of New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
On 22 February 2024, Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case of YSL v Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 391 (KB). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
Having written at great length about the operation of the law, Graham v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:38 am
More David v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
