Search for: "People v. Kern"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Kerns, Esquire. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
By way of perspective, several early 1800s American cases (I know of four published opinions, Ruggles, Updegraph, Kneeland, and Murray) upheld convictions for blasphemy of Christianity, sometimes based on similar facts: People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
I'm certain -- or at least hope -- that this opinion corrects this practice.Though, in the meantime, there are all these people, like Mr. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:38 am
-John The post Hourly v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
A California Judge Allows a Baker to Discriminate Against a Lesbian Couple Who Wanted a Wedding Cake
7 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
” And in Roberts v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 10:30 pm
Kerns, LLC. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
According to Justice Kern, the law as written was not littered with discrepancies but was unambiguous as drafted. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm
” [@ClarkHat on Twitter] “Kern County, a jurisdiction with a long unfortunate history of putting the wrong people in prison” [Radley Balko, Glenn Reynolds/USA Today on People v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In Steinhouse v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In Steinhouse v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 4:43 pm
Kern, 449 Mass. 641 (2007) focuses on a limited aspect of the statute. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
(People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:54 am
In fact, the Illinois case of Coleman v. [read post]
