Search for: "People v. Law"
Results 21 - 40
of 49,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm
On February 21, 2017 the defendant plead guilty to rape in the 3d degree pursuant to Penal Law 130.25(3). [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 3:53 pm
But it appears that People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:55 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
People v Trevor Frederick, decided June 10th, is an odd set of facts. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
Answer: The law under People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:01 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:09 am
April 16, 2020) The post Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:33 pm
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:00 am
The People may prove an unlawful act by showing virtually any violation of federal, state, or local law. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:05 am
Davis, Case No. 282994, holding that People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm
On February 21, 2017 the defendant plead guilty to rape in the 3d degree pursuant to Penal Law 130.25(3). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:17 pm
Plaintiffs finally did get around to filing a memorandum of law, four (4) days after the filing deadline, in Arista v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Dueñas" -- which is ironic, as the opinion (which is actually People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm
The court may also consider "reliable hearsay," including the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Hucks, 72 A.D.3d 1608, 1609, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 706; see People v Cunning . . [read post]
