Search for: "People v. Lin"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm
BCZ[10] and Enka v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 4:12 pm
Cox v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 4:34 am
Written by Jidong Lin, Wuhan University Institute of International Law Background China’s newly amended Civil Procedure Law (“CPL 2024”), which came into effect on 1 January 2024, introduces several distinct and innovative changes. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am
I hope that people instead think about what really happened here: Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
Hardly any topic is more ubiquitous these days than Lin-Manuel Miranda’s smash musical. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
Contrary to the Claimant’s arguments, R v Isington London Borough Council ex parte Reilly and Mannix (1998) 31 HLR 651, and R (on the application of Lin) v Barnet London Borough Council [2007] EWCA (Civ) 132 do not establish that such a policy must be incorporated into the scheme itself to meet s.167(8). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
The entire chaos and suffering of the cultural revolution were in fact an attempt by Chairman Mao and his protégé, Lin Biao, people who sought to advance their own power and positions, to seize the legitimately earned positions of power and authority (and the love of the people of China) from Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping and many of their supporters, as well as that of the rivals in the Chinese military (the PLA) to Lin Biao. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
The IPKat is delighted to receive a guest post by Xi Lin (PhD candidate in IP law at Maastricht University) commenting on Jin Yong v Jiang Nan. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:41 am
Guiding Case No. 29, Tianjin China Youth Travel Service v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 727 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1984) (DES – back to UK); Lin v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Beyond being a useful summary of existing practice, there’s also something new, says Darren.* Looking back over this GreeKat shoulder… Part II: How “lifestyle paternalism” might threaten brandsAfter addressing plain packaging in Part I of this series, Nicos takes a look at another kind of using brands to teach people how to live. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
Dorrance, Stuart v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:27 am
E.g., Lin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court examined this clause during oral argument in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 1:21 am
Chen Fanglin, Fujian High People’s court held that such a clause does not violate CPL and recognized its validity. [14] Second, party autonomy in civil and commercial litigations should be protected.[15] In Sun Jichuan v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:17 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:47 am
"TTABlog note: For additional discussion of this issue, see Section V of the article "The TTAB in 2007: Rules, Rulings, and Repurcussions," co-authored with Ann Lamport Hammitte.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:34 am
Old Hong Kong v New Hong Kong here, here and here Hong Kong IPD here Hong Kong alley cat adoptions here [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
Members who have traveled to Alabama include: Rep Luis V. [read post]
